hes not taking military action, but he is going to bomb them.
also jet, Syria is not planning on handing over their weapons to Russia, so Obama bombing Syria seems like the only logical chance of ending chemical warfare going on there.
I don't necessarily agree with what Obama said, but that's what he was basically going at
shorts that first part rigth there........
any who i have been talkign about this for a looooooooooooooooong time in the saw this thread.
shorts its a lose lose for us, the rebeals are mainly radical jihaidists who wish us harm, as well as groups like alkiada, you remmber alkida dont you?
so if we bobm asiad we are helping alkiada and the peopel who want to kil us. these rbels you can fidn on yotube still probly, of the rebel leader cutting a mans chest open while he was alive and eating his heart. of the rebels lining up unarmed mena dn shoting them in the head. these are the peopel we want to help?
igrnoring asiad is using his troops to protect christion and moderate muslum towns form these barbariaons.
so lets saw we even go in and bobm a few places........so what? asiad is still in power, he could very wel still have more cheimcal weapons. what do we do if he uses them again? do we put boots on the ground? do we really want another middle eastern war? and this time of all things over a civil war there having.....
wasting our money and our lives for what? to stop a civil war we have nothign to do with?
but then you all tell me but agy but agy they used chemical wepaons!
who used chemical wepaons? we knwo they were used but theres no proof it was asaids forces. and it looks bad for the rebels sicne they were attckign the un inspectors there to see if eh did use them.
why must w go in now? becuse someone used chemical wepaons to kill 1k people? what about the over 100k peopel who have died now for over 2 years, do they not count? its now not how many are dead but the manner of witch they are killed?
why stop at syira? we shoudl go into eery hot spot then, liek eygpity where cristains are hunted in the streets, were nuns are raped. why arnt we there yet? why do we get to pick and chose witch new crissies we have to waist are lives for?
syira is not iraw and afganistan. this will be a much more brutal war when and if it comes. the us mainstay for power is our supsiraior air force. syria has extreamly advance anti air wepaons maned by RUSSIA soilders. not to metions russia has its largist base out side of russia in syria. the nightmare of a proxiy war with russia is bad enough.
emagin if we have to set foto in there and iran/russia/china/insert terrosit groups here figth back.
china is alreayd saying there gona brign down the world market with all there power if we attack, iran is sayign they will retailait, russia is all btu sayign it too.
they knwo we are weak now, after such long wars and a bad economy, and they know dear leader (obama) is VERY weak when it comes to forion affirs, so is his staff. remmber john kerry our sectary of state is the same guy who was before congress destrying our troops during the veinatam war. is now tellign us to go to war with syira.........
if we go into syira it may well be the start of ww3, and its a war we may not win with the current state of amrica.
think its cool to always rag on amrica? wait till russia/china/islamist take over. you will beg for us to be back.