0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Nahhh if I miss, the dirt oughta kill em! (or the shrapnel of the fridge?)
Quote from: Circlecat113 on December 21, 2017, 02:00:34 PMNahhh if I miss, the dirt oughta kill em! (or the shrapnel of the fridge?)By the sounds of it, you live in the countryside xD
Honestly, I don't see why it shouldn't be banned. Any modifications that make the gun more dangerous should. Extended mags, bump stocks, fookin lazersights... Okay maybe not that last one. But honestly I don't know why anyone would need an AR for any purpose other than murder. Using them for hunting will most likely tear up the animal and using it for home defense is overkill and will probably do massive damage to your property.
Quote from: Sargnarg the Hardge Harg on December 21, 2017, 12:07:39 PMHonestly, I don't see why it shouldn't be banned. Any modifications that make the gun more dangerous should. Extended mags, bump stocks, fookin lazersights... Okay maybe not that last one. But honestly I don't know why anyone would need an AR for any purpose other than murder. Using them for hunting will most likely tear up the animal and using it for home defense is overkill and will probably do massive damage to your property.Here Are 7 Animals Hunters Kill Using an AR-15Why You Should Use an AR-15 as a Deer Rifle12 reasons I hunt with an AR-15 (and you should too)The AR for Home Defense: One Expert's OpinionAR-15 Used In Oklahoma Home Defense; Same Rifle 4th Circuit Court Says Americans Should Not HaveBut yes, all I use my AR-15 for is murder.
He can correct me if I am misreading his intentions. But I think he meant AR as in Assault Rifle (As in a select fire mag-fed rifle), Not AR-15.Well as shown in the original video, the man uses an AR-15.In this case I would put that in the same boat as .50 cals. Though I think it's a bit excessive to own a .50 cal, I can see why people would want to have one because it looks bloody fun to shoot it at something. Same for full auto, Be it mocked up full auto or actual full auto.It's funny because when it comes to .50 cal, The argument changes. You can't feasibly call that a murder weapon because who in their right mind would use it for murder? So it goes to it being impractical. The reason for wanting it is the same, But the argument against it changes.Should there be regulations? Yes. People need to stop being so sensitive about regulations.I never said anything against regulation. I dont believe there to be any reason to own a full-auto wepaon. Luckily theyre already banned in almost all 50 states. I simply disagreed with his opinion of "I cant see why anyone would ever need that gun besides murder."
I am sorry for making it about politics. I know I am not going to change anyone's mind, so I am just going to try to avoid talking politics outside of the "saw this" thread.
Quote from: Curmescius on December 22, 2017, 09:46:48 AMHe can correct me if I am misreading his intentions. But I think he meant AR as in Assault Rifle (As in a select fire mag-fed rifle), Not AR-15.Well as shown in the original video, the man uses an AR-15.In this case I would put that in the same boat as .50 cals. Though I think it's a bit excessive to own a .50 cal, I can see why people would want to have one because it looks bloody fun to shoot it at something. Same for full auto, Be it mocked up full auto or actual full auto.It's funny because when it comes to .50 cal, The argument changes. You can't feasibly call that a murder weapon because who in their right mind would use it for murder? So it goes to it being impractical. The reason for wanting it is the same, But the argument against it changes.Should there be regulations? Yes. People need to stop being so sensitive about regulations.I never said anything against regulation. I dont believe there to be any reason to own a full-auto wepaon. Luckily theyre already banned in almost all 50 states. I simply disagreed with his opinion of "I cant see why anyone would ever need that gun besides murder."Quote from: Sargnarg the Hardge Harg on December 22, 2017, 10:33:16 AMI am sorry for making it about politics. I know I am not going to change anyone's mind, so I am just going to try to avoid talking politics outside of the "saw this" thread. My fault really, shouldnt have spat back at you
Quote from: Nefty on December 22, 2017, 01:54:30 PMQuote from: Curmescius on December 22, 2017, 09:46:48 AMHe can correct me if I am misreading his intentions. But I think he meant AR as in Assault Rifle (As in a select fire mag-fed rifle), Not AR-15.Well as shown in the original video, the man uses an AR-15.In this case I would put that in the same boat as .50 cals. Though I think it's a bit excessive to own a .50 cal, I can see why people would want to have one because it looks bloody fun to shoot it at something. Same for full auto, Be it mocked up full auto or actual full auto.It's funny because when it comes to .50 cal, The argument changes. You can't feasibly call that a murder weapon because who in their right mind would use it for murder? So it goes to it being impractical. The reason for wanting it is the same, But the argument against it changes.Should there be regulations? Yes. People need to stop being so sensitive about regulations.I never said anything against regulation. I dont believe there to be any reason to own a full-auto wepaon. Luckily theyre already banned in almost all 50 states. I simply disagreed with his opinion of "I cant see why anyone would ever need that gun besides murder."Quote from: Sargnarg the Hardge Harg on December 22, 2017, 10:33:16 AMI am sorry for making it about politics. I know I am not going to change anyone's mind, so I am just going to try to avoid talking politics outside of the "saw this" thread. My fault really, shouldnt have spat back at you It's fine..wasnt this in fun house at one point?
Quote from: Sargnarg the Hardge Harg on December 22, 2017, 02:06:18 PMQuote from: Nefty on December 22, 2017, 01:54:30 PMQuote from: Curmescius on December 22, 2017, 09:46:48 AMHe can correct me if I am misreading his intentions. But I think he meant AR as in Assault Rifle (As in a select fire mag-fed rifle), Not AR-15.Well as shown in the original video, the man uses an AR-15.In this case I would put that in the same boat as .50 cals. Though I think it's a bit excessive to own a .50 cal, I can see why people would want to have one because it looks bloody fun to shoot it at something. Same for full auto, Be it mocked up full auto or actual full auto.It's funny because when it comes to .50 cal, The argument changes. You can't feasibly call that a murder weapon because who in their right mind would use it for murder? So it goes to it being impractical. The reason for wanting it is the same, But the argument against it changes.Should there be regulations? Yes. People need to stop being so sensitive about regulations.I never said anything against regulation. I dont believe there to be any reason to own a full-auto wepaon. Luckily theyre already banned in almost all 50 states. I simply disagreed with his opinion of "I cant see why anyone would ever need that gun besides murder."Quote from: Sargnarg the Hardge Harg on December 22, 2017, 10:33:16 AMI am sorry for making it about politics. I know I am not going to change anyone's mind, so I am just going to try to avoid talking politics outside of the "saw this" thread. My fault really, shouldnt have spat back at you It's fine..wasnt this in fun house at one point?Yes i requested it be moved, didnt seem fun house appropriate tbh.
The second I saw that it turned political I was like "oh avocado, what have I done"